How I resonated with Crazy Rich Asians

I am of Asian descent, and I mostly identify as Californian more than I do as Asian. That’s because my whole family is from and currently lives in California. I’m 100% Asian by blood, and 100% American in culture (whatever that means… I value independence, family and good food).

I understand that many Asian-Americans did not resonate with the movie. I recognize that everybody has their own story to tell and this movie just told one of the fictitious rom-com ones. Still, the direction and acting in the movie was well-done and I found plenty to resonate with.

I also suppose that I could’ve easily been one of those others who claimed to not resonate with the movie. Honestly, if it weren’t for my life experiences in the past couple of years, I would have approached the movie with a mild amusement and appreciation. And what happened in the last couple of years, you might ask? Well, I partook in my own romantic drama by meeting and marrying my husband and his family.

Related post: 22 reasons I love my husband

It wasn’t the Crazy part, nor the Rich part, nor the Asian part exactly that I resonated with. It was the aspect of families from different backgrounds coming together and a confrontation of core values. 

And so, you don’t have to be crazy, rich, nor Asian to resonate with the movie. In fact, there are SO many people who have gone through the ‘meeting of the families’ with similar trepidation and hurdles all over the place!

Note, if you haven’t seen the movie yet AND plan to AND don’t want to hear all the story plotlines, then stop reading and please come back after you have watched it to hear my side of it.

Here’s how the movie went for me:

We saw Crazy Rich Asians in theaters on Sunday. Really interesting to go out on opening weekend and yet find the theater mostly empty. We were in west Chicago where the population is mostly Mexican. Furthermore, we were the only people of Asian descent in the theater, which wasn’t weird, it just meant that there we were the only ones giving hollahs and cheers at seeing our favorite stars on screen [I love Constance and Ken, while husband loves Jimmy O. Yang].

The experience of watching the movie itself was quite pleasant. Generally, I’m not a teary mess when I watch movies and so I only really cried during two parts:  when her mom came to console her [man I love my mom] and of course at the end when Nick pops the question.

Now, resonating with Crazy Rich Asians really starts with resonating with the main character, Rachel Chu. Even though my situation isn’t the exact same as Rachel Chu (of course it’s not going to be exactly the same), there was still plenty in common as an Asian-American woman who wants to have a self-made career in being a professor and making my own life.

Rachel’s character was so well-developed that she did not follow a single trope. She had an integrated identity as an academic, romantic partner, and being a culturally aware, self-actualized, funny girl. Here are some examples:

  • She does not boast about her achievements yet confidently tells people her position during introductions. She is unapologetic about her family background and emphasizes the hard work that got her here.
  • During the Mahjong scene, she is contemplative, gentle, and coy. Being an expert in game theory, she knows what her opponent knows and uses that knowledge to affect the game and the ultimate outcome (one that has the best welfare for all parties) at the end.
  • In conversations with Nick, she expresses her true need and commitment to intimacy and truth in a relationship, *paraphrased* “It’s not about all the crazy situation and stuff that happened, it’s that I didn’t hear it straight from you.”
  • When attacked by other girls, she rose above and buried the fish. She did not slide into playing the same cat games, get greedy, or get overwhelmed when others accused her of being a gold-digger.
  • Even when she played out her ‘bok bok bitch’ plan, it involved talking about microeconomic policy with a princess and wearing a deep-v gown without typical hollywood cleavage. Like I said, no single trope can encapsulate her. it’s just… her!
  • And my favorite, which I will use in the future *wink*… “Hubba hubba!! Awooga awooga!!!”

Of course, I am not exactly Rachel Chu (she is herself, already), but I do seek the same academic-side, vulnerability, authenticity, silliness and deep connection that she does. And so I resonate with the character for who she is.

I also resonate with the character for what she goes through in the movie. She met someone special and met his family. I too met someone special and met his family in the past couple of years. I felt completely upended coming face-to-face with their expectations and being unsure if I really fit into the picture.

My husband was born in China, was raised by his grandparents for the first years and then came over to the US to join his parents who had sought higher education opportunities in California. So for the last 25 years, the family has lived in the US, moving around to various states and cities due to changing job circumstances. They speak mostly English at home and are quite integrated into American culture. Still, they are Chinese.

While getting to know my husband’s family, I never got the exact message, “You’ll never be enough,” like in the movie. But I did get some comments like, “You’re not Chinese. You’re American. Your family is American.”

Yes, this is true (I admit it at the beginning of this post). But it still caused me to be shaken when told straight to my face.

This aspect of ‘enough’ isn’t the same as in the movie. In the movie, ‘enough’ meant pedigree, wealth, ability to assimilate… Still, I got undertones about what was not ‘enough’, which meant an inability for our families to perfectly match together in tradition.

I felt like there was so much for me that I had to learn about their culture. To be honest, I didn’t really have any Chinese (like grew up in China) friends at that time. It was totally different! The China that my ancestors were from was different from the China that I had visited once as schoolkid, which again is so different from the China of today.

Today, China has so much development and abundance. Not as much per capita as in Singapore, but much more than I knew about. I was surprised that leaving food on the table was a sign of abundance, a good value instead of a bad one.

And so when I was faced with this new situation of getting to know my in-laws, there was a lot to mentally process.

I had thoughts like, “How do I fit within this family?” “What are their expectations of me?” “Do I want to be a part of that?” “If so, how will I establish my boundaries in this relationship while also adopting them as a part of me?”

The situation was made really complicated in my head especially when I went to China to meet the family.

When I got there, I behaved very similarly to how Rachel Chu behaved. I did not adapt. I felt foreign even though I looked Chinese. When people heard that I and my family didn’t speak Mandarin, there were confused faces. The conversation couldn’t really go to the deep topics that I normally enjoy talking about. So I felt like I couldn’t be myself.

Related post: The 3 major turning points in my life so far

There were also other times in our romantic relationship where I came up against competing expectations. For example, when they invited me on an international vacation and offered to pay for it, I felt belittled, as if I wasn’t able to pay for it on my own. I also felt like my companionship was being bought, which made me feel cheap. Of course, these were not their intentions–they simply were generous and wanted to alleviate a burden. But just like Rachel Chu, I was bothered that these acts didn’t come straight from my spouse.

There have been other times, too, when family actions seemed to interfere with the relationship (in good, bad, and neutral ways). And I’m sure that they’ll keep coming as we have more and more of life to live with each other. The best thing now, though, is that I have learned that I have to remain true to myself and speak my boundaries in order to not second-guess and doubt their identities as good people. 

Related post: Why do ‘good’ people do ‘bad’ things?

I’m deciding to take a high ground here and not enumerate on all the situations in the past that had bothered me about our families and the mismatch of expectations. Just trust me that there were a lot of little things that I had to progressively climb the brave mountain to become more okay with each one. Instead, I want to focus on what I DID to navigate it.

One of the first things I had to do was conscious complaining. I found a friend whom I could catch up with periodically to dump all of the complainings on. This friend was safe–all confidentiality and zero judgments. This was important since I probably said insensitive and naive things that I wouldn’t want to be repeated. Lastly, this friend could really empathize and tell me that ‘those things are normal for Chinese people,’ which really grounded me back to reality and put everything into a healthier perspective.

Second, I had to focus on what my ultimate core values were. Autonomy told me that it was not okay for another family to have a say in what I do. Intimacy encouraged me that I want to actually have a close relationship with this new family in the long-run, which is more important than the actual issues between us. Honesty told me that I had to speak up on what I was feeling. Self-development encouraged me that I would definitely grow in my courage and self-expression to have an actual serious conversation about this. Spirituality helped me put faith in God’s sovereignty during the process.

And then lastly, I had to set the actual boundary. I had never been vulnerable yet with my in-laws at the time. But two Thanksgivings ago it was really tugging at me and I had to have a sitdown conversation when I came to visit them. I cried a LOT when divulging on how it made me feel to have their involvement in my life, even though I couldn’t explain well the reason for it. I pushed hard for a new guideline on communication, which felt suuuper uncomfortable. And they listened, asked questions, and agreed!

Related post: The value and normalization of discomfort

Now, I make it sound super simple, but it kinda was even though it’s going to feel super tough in the first 10 minutes. The key will be how much you stick to it despite the initial pain. Resolution comes through perseverance and keeping your mind set on the fulfillment of your values.

What would Rachel Chu have done? I really believe, based upon the kind of character she is, that she would’ve done the exact same thing if she were in my situation. She’d gracefully confront, knowing her true values in achieving deep relationships and self-actualization.

If you or a friend are going through something similar with the clash of family values, you are not alone! This is a universal struggle–take heart! I’d love to hear your story. Leave a comment or setup a time to chat with me so I can learn about it.

Is your PhD stuck on Mars? Apply the Martian Method

Tips for those who are stuck due to external circumstances. I’ve experienced this during the summer and would say that I’ve engaged in step one everyday and it really helps! And once I’ve taken care of myself, steps 2 and 3 have happened more naturally and with less resistance. Thanks, @roseychang

The Thesis Whisperer

Ever felt stuck? All researchers, no matter how experienced, get stuck sometimes, but during your PhD, when the clock is ticking, getting stuck is very stressful. This post is by Rosemary Chang: academic developer, writer and researcher. In her role at RMIT University, she partners with university staff on scholarshipof learning and teaching (SoTL) initiatives. Her PhD research explores writers’ experiences of strong emotions in connection to writing through the lens of mindfulness. Her project involves teaching mindfulness meditation to creative writers, and developing a novel. Her interests include Zen arts practice, contemplative education, and mindfulness in the curriculum.

She tweets about writing, mindfulness and life @RoseyChang.

‘Hello!’ to anyone who’s stuck in their PhD. I feel for you. As I write, I’m half-way through my PhD program, and I’ve been stuck too. I’m out the other side now, but it’s made me think: a PhD and Mars have…

View original post 998 more words

How I became an activist

It really was the Chicago Urban Program (CUP) that helped me change my identity from a lost child trying to make the best sense of the world to an activist who has the capability to make lasting change in peoples’ lives on an individual and grand scale.

In this program, we were given a scriptural basis for why God longs for there to be justice, reconciliation, and renewal on earth. When I read Isaiah 58 during a morning devotional, it was so clear to me,

“Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen:
to loose the chains of injustice
    and untie the cords of the yoke,
to set the oppressed free
    and break every yoke?
Is it not to share your food with the hungry
    and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter—
when you see the naked, to clothe them,
    and not to turn away from your own flesh and blood?
Then your light will break forth like the dawn,
    and your healing will quickly appear;
then your righteousness[a] will go before you,
    and the glory of the Lord will be your rear guard.
Then you will call, and the Lord will answer;
    you will cry for help, and he will say: Here am I.

“If you do away with the yoke of oppression,
    with the pointing finger and malicious talk,
10 and if you spend yourselves in behalf of the hungry
    and satisfy the needs of the oppressed,
then your light will rise in the darkness,
    and your night will become like the noonday.
11 The Lord will guide you always;
    he will satisfy your needs in a sun-scorched land
    and will strengthen your frame.
You will be like a well-watered garden,
    like a spring whose waters never fail.
12 Your people will rebuild the ancient ruins
    and will raise up the age-old foundations;
you will be called Repairer of Broken Walls,
    Restorer of Streets with Dwellings.

How do you feel when you read this?

Well, so I must’ve read this before (because I know I have read the entire Bible in 2015). But when I read this in Spring 2017, I was realizing for the first time that all along I had permission to carry out social justice. Before, I  was scared of partaking in social justice because of how politically charged it can be. I was also afraid of it because I didn’t know how Christians were supposed to behave. My eyes were not yet unveiled to see that Christianity MEANS serving others like how the Lord serves.

 

It’s the same kind of mind-altering, paradigm-shifting event as taking calculus for the first time … or even better, physics WITH calculus… or EVEN better, being born again through the Holy Spirit.

Now I am better in my awareness, able to recognize causes that are aligned with social justice and able to assess how effective they’re doing. Once I do that, I am now able to join alongside them, vouch for them, give them praise and support them.

Remember, it’s always a gain in consciousness BEFORE we can act on it. That’s because our action always has to be a choice. Forcing someone else into serving doesn’t work. It’s their choice, which means it has to come from their eyes being open in the first place.

The choices that I make now are to dive head-first into things that’ll scare me if I know that it’ll pay out in emotional connection, compassion, understanding, and empathy.

I want to raise my voice since noone else can tell my story. My voice is just among the thousands, but it’s all a growth process that we must all undergo to be effective citizens of this world. Right after attending CUP, I attended my first public march to show solidarity (especially as an Asian American) and to let people know that it’s possible to hold a ‘middle’ viewpoint (an opinion that doesn’t fall into one extreme or the other).

img_20170422_100727
The sign I made for the March for Science felt super brave to me.

It scared me to do that, but I used my courage muscles. I got some affirmation from some who agreed. But mostly, I didn’t really get a response. I conjecture that maybe people aren’t used to non-polarized stances. And that’s okay.

I want to be ears for those who have stories ready-to-tell. We know that everyone has a story, but now I get to listen, validate, and connect those stories to others that I’ve heard.

I now find myself being more likely to watch a video with a polarizing title. Before, it would scare me. I was scared that I’d have a bad reaction to it. Or I was scared that it would challenge my point of view that would weaken me. Now though, I know that curiosity and listening is WAY more important than the negative consequences that I feared. Furthermore, I noticed that no negative consequences came when I truly listened to another point of view. Instead, my perspective shifted and became stronger, wider, more encompassing, closer to the truth.

I’ve really wanted to write this post for a long time but never knew exactly how to do it. That’s my clever brain (the unproductive spirit who negates everything good in my life haha) getting me down. Clever brain told me that I had to have the perfect wording to not offend others. It told me that there’s no use in putting my story out there because it’s not inspiring enough. And yea, maybe this won’t go viral, but that doesn’t invalidate my writing, processing, and courageous act of hitting ‘publish’.

Braving the Wilderness

Disclaimer- this is a rewrite of my personal notes from the book by Brene Brown. It includes quotes that I liked, personal thoughts of how I’d like to apply it, and also judgements that I have of the topics discussed. I have not gone through and carefully edited this content. It is raw and it is mine. If you’d like to discuss any of these points further, I’d love that! Drop me a comment or schedule a time to chat with me on my home page.

Preface: I was first interested in this book after reading Brene’s other books, Daring Greatly and Rising Strong. I have not read her first two books, I thought it was just me and the Gifts of Imperfection

I love Brene’s research findings and her unique voice. What a journey she has gone through and continues to go through. Courage in vulnerability was my favorite messages of hers to date. And I made no hesitation to preorder this new book when I saw it announced on her facebook page this past September. When I received the book, I didn’t read it right away since I was waiting to read it with my book group. So we started reading this book together in December and we just finished in February. I’ve enjoyed discussing this short book with my friends and have already seen the fruits in my life of what it means to truly belong. I hope you also enjoy.

Chapter 1- “You are only free when you realize you belong no place–you belong every place–no place at all. The price is higher. The reward is great.” -Maya Angelou

True belonging- being alone but still belonging.

We want the squad. But the sqad isn’t the same as us.

Maya belongs to Maya. [Brene got to meet Maya on Oprah’s show and oh boy what a powerful experience. You gotta read the book to get her exact words.]

Chapter 2-

Belonging (definition from the Gifts of Imperfection)- Desire to be part of something larger than us. Our sense of belonging can never be greater than our level of self-acceptance. [Yes! We have to realize our acceptance unconditionally before having belonging]

Being CALLED to stand –> Finding the courage to stand alone. [Sometimes we are afraid to stand in our calling. The answer is courage.]

“To brave the wilderness of uncertainty, vulnerability, and criticism” [What does the wilderness hold?] we have to be Connected by love and the human spirit, meaning part of the same spiritual story.

Spiritual Disconnectedness- (where our culture comes from) Diminishes sense of shared humanity. Currently we have shared fear and disdain and are more aware of the pressure to ‘fit in’ and conform… “Perfecting, Pleaseing, Providing, Pretending.” Belonging for others takes the form of these 4 P’s.

People want real connection without costing authenticity, freedom, or power. People should be uniting in common humanity, shared trust, respect and love.

Definition of Spirituality from the Gifts of Imperfection, “Recognizing and celebrating that we’re all inextricably connected to each other by a power greater than all of us, … grounded in love and compassion.”

Four Elements of True Belonging:

  1. People are hard to hate close up. Move in
  2. Speak truth to BS, Be civil
  3. Hold hands. With strangers
  4. Strong back. Soft front. Wild heart. (being in the wilderness for/as yourself.

[I really see #1 and #4 connected by the two practices of Curiosity and Compassion]

The Wilderness solitude, vulnerability, the emotional, spiritual, and physical quest. “Belonging so fully to yourself that you’re willing to stand alone IS a wilderness.” It’s about courage to BE the wilderness.

Braving skills to build trust. Definition: choosing to risk making something you value vulnerable to another person’s actions.

Seven Elements of Trust BRAVING acronym

  • Boundaries
  • Reliability
  • Accountability (responsibility)
  • Vault (keeping confidentiality)
  • Integrity
  • Nonjudgement (for expression)
  • Generosity

[My thought: do these also apply for self-trust and trust in the Lord?]

Definition of True Belonging- The spiritual practice of believing in and belonging to yourself so deeply that you can share your most authentic self with the world and find sacrednes in both being a part of something and standing alone in the wilderness. True belonging doesn’t require you to CHANGE who you are; it requires you to BE who you are.

[if somehow this change vs being thing doesn’t make sense to you, I really recommend the Power of Receiving]

Chapter 4-

[yes, i’ve somehow lost my notes on Chapter 3, which was about the research methods… i think. I’ve also relent the book to one of my disciples… so yea.]

There are boundaries in the wilderness. The more clear and reinforced, more empathy and compassion for others. Openness. Where people are not taking advantage of or threatening you. It’s more than emotional… it directly leads to violence.

Boundary of emotional safety- No dehumanizing language or behavior. It’s okay to get feelings hurt or listen to a dissenting opinion. Dehumanizing language is (by Michelle Maiese)…

  • Demonizing the enemy (people)
  • Making THEM seem less than human
  • or seem not worthy of humane treatment.
  • Zero sum thinking (us or them)
  • Your goal is to punish the opponent
  • Creating moreal exclusion

The process of rehumanization: No double standards, reject it! Feel concerned and become hurt equally and get curious.

You CAN support both. Accept the tension and vulnerability. It’s the wilderness. It’s messier and important to true belonging.

Coverup and favoritism by who is ‘in’ the org. Shame becomes systematic, money drives ethics and no accountability.

Michelle Buck (clinical professor of leadership at Kellogg school of management):  “Agree to disagree” is silencing. You choose to remain misinformed, easier to make assumptions which leads to misunderstanding and resentment.

Instead, strive for mutual understanding, respect and connection. Get to the underlying intentions. [This reminds me of another book I’m reading that says, The goal of a conversation is understanding, not agreement.]

Instead, create agreement (or ask for) how to make a shared future.

Chapter 5-

Opens with a quote from Harry G. Frankfurt (philosophy professor) that says liars defy the authority of the Truth and refuse to meet its demands. Bullshitters ignore the demands, which makes them the greater enemy of the truth than liars are.

BS- driven by emotion. We’re compelled to always have an opinion and pick sides. It’s better and harder to be CURIOUS, which is sometimes seen as antagonism. Also, people currently are skeptical and deny that we can ever know the truth. So it then becomes personal truth.

Thinking that somebody is for or against is a false dichotomy.

Civility- “Claiming and caring for one’s identity or beliefs without degrading. Disagree with respect, seek common ground, listen past preconceptions. Negotiation interpersonal power so everyone’s heard.” Caution! “even tools of civility can become weaponized if the intention is there.” [This definition really surprised me. I used to have a thought that civility meant withholding your thoughts and beliefs. Instead, this definition is an ACTIVE one where you can actually do something with someone else’s beliefs.]

She taught listening and apologizing without disclaimers and exceptions. [woops, i’m guilty]

Applying the BRAVING checklist with respect to BS:

  • Boundaries- how to set them when knee deep in BS? [go to the microscopic truth? Release and confession? Allow conversation to be finished as a consequence?]
  • Reliability- abandon it
  • Accountability- to off-load less and be more civil [maybe off-loading safely to a group or in prayer so no pressure to always off-load?]
  • Vault- civility honors confidentiality
  • Integrity- admitting curiosity with questions or that the conversation is going downhill.
  • Non-judgement- instead of “winner/loser” mode. Makes opportunity for connection
  • Generosity- need the most generous assumption of people to be civil.

Chapter 6- Hold hands with strangers

Pema Chodron on covering it with leather. Watch the video.

“[Those] with the strongest true belonging practices maintain the belief in inextricable connection by engaging in moments of joy and pain with strangers.”

Common Enemy Intimacy- [This is when you say, “Oh you dislike those people? I do too! Let’s be friends and talk about how much we dislike those people.” oh man, this is something that I immediately stopped after I read this part. Haven’t gotten good enough yet to stop others from doing it around me…] connection by judging/mocking others. It’s NOT REAL because…

  • it causes pain.
  • “either with or for us” mentality is reinforced
  • It’s the opposite of true belonging
  • Causes anxiousness because you need to stay within the lines
  • Extremist “share leveraging any opportunity to discharge their denied and festering pain, hurt, and feelings of smallness or powerlessness.”
  • Face to face connection is necessary (and it’s taken away when your enemies are talking about you behind your back)
  • Foreboding joy- changing your joy out of fear and temperance so that your vulnerability can be beat.

The only way to combat this is Gratitude.


There are more chapters, but I guess I didn’t write my notes on them in my bullet journal. I lent the book to one of my disciples, so that’s all I got for now. In the future, I will probably update this post.

Anyhoo… I hope you gained a lot from this notes dump. I highly recommend reading/listening to the book yourself since it contains all of the personal anecdotes, the data and Brene’s voice. Please study the contents of this book in order to really understand them. These concepts are meant to be practiced. Not once, but continually over a lifetime to create more connection in the world. We all seek belonging. You can help yourself by realizing that you ARE the wilderness.